Page 13 - RC18-EDGE Spring.FINAL
P. 13

Connected Data: Design Process Technical System Integration


          Based on anecdotal conversations we started to analyze   and custom application interfaces to address our bidirec-
          a broad spectrum of roles and responsibilities. It became   tional and unidirectional data exchanges.
          apparent many daily tasks had become disconnected and   During our development cycle, the intrinsic value of prepar-
          layered with unnecessary duplication. As we assessed the   ing detailed workflow process blue prints, with accompa-
          way people worked, our end users struggled to visualize   nying swim-lane diagrams, became evident. It guided our
          the possibilities and were becoming increasingly uncom-  strategic in-depth review of each application’s ERD (Entity
          fortable with change. This dilemma is one every agent of   Relationship Diagram), focusing on table indexes and field
          change has faced, knowing without stakeholder’s support,   attributes essential to successful data mapping. Further-
          moving forward is fraught with risk and uncertainty.  more, the creation of custom staging tables facilitating
                                                               field level transformation based on business process trig-
          To rebuild confidence and trust in technology, we turned   gers were developed to maintain system integrity.
          to a new digital approach to illuminate our vision: story-
          boarding. Through a series of meetings with key employ-  With disparate data silos now connected, our employ-
          ees, we delved into current processes, pain points, system   ees had the ability to see trends and behavioral patterns
          usability, and reporting requirements. The result utlized   across the entire lifecycle, building a foundation for
          a graphical UX / UI approach that brought our findings   strategic engagement. Through an intuitive graphical
          to life in a simple, intuitive fashion. Through a “Business   interface, managers and analysts could also visualize
          Lifecycle Storyboard,” our end users were able to clearly   data from different viewpoints empowering them to make
          visualize how technology would enhance their daily tasks   more accurate and timely business decisions. Over time,
          and interactions with prospects and clients.         as historical data points are collected, new patterns will
                                                               emerge allowing dynamic decision making to drive reve-
          A supplemental “Technical Workflow Storyboard” provided   nue increases and operating efficiencies.
          programmers with a roadmap to accomplish our goals.
          These detailed design specifications translated each task   Cyber security risks are growing daily, and with propri-
          into four main components, system touch points, pro-  etary data, intellectual property, and perhaps a firm’s
          cess inputs, process outputs and reporting parameters.   competitive advantage traversing the cloud our vulnerabil-
          Through the visualization process, we were quickly able   ities grow as well. When constructing system interfaces
          to discern no single integration method would satisfy   and data connections, always incorporate a few simple
          our comprehensive application integration requirements.   precautionary cyber guidelines:
          After reviewing each platform’s architecture, we blended
          Application Program Interfaces (API), SaaS Integration   •  Require VPN connections for data exchange;
          Platforms, JavaScript Object Notation (JSON), Apex code   •  Whitelist traffic using firewall rules;

                                                                                                                11
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18