Weekly Briefing

Are We Far Behind in Our Smart Building Strategy?

Listen to this article

There is a question every building owner, facility executive, engineer, system integrator, and technology provider should be asking: Are we far behind?

Not behind your competitors. Not behind the newest product announcement. Not behind the latest industry buzzword.

The more important question is whether your building automation, controls, operational technology, and data infrastructure are keeping pace with what your buildings need to do today – and what they will be expected to do tomorrow.

Because the definition of a well-performing building is changing. It is no longer enough for the HVAC system to maintain temperature, the lights to turn on, and alarms to appear on a workstation.

Buildings are increasingly expected to be connected, integrated, secure, energy-efficient, data-driven, adaptable, interoperable, and capable of supporting technologies and applications that may not have existed when their automation systems were originally installed.

And that creates an uncomfortable possibility: Your building may be operating – but still be falling behind.

The Building May Work. The Architecture May Not.

One of the biggest challenges in building automation is that outdated infrastructure does not necessarily look outdated.

The building is occupied. The equipment runs. Temperatures are maintained. The BAS graphics still work. Alarms still appear. Operators can still change setpoints.

From an operational perspective, everything may appear fine. But underneath that apparent normalcy may be an automation architecture designed for a very different era. An era before widespread IP connectivity. Before cloud computing. Before cybersecurity became an operational requirement. Before enterprise analytics. Before digital twins. Before AI. Before grid-interactive buildings. Before operational data became an enterprise asset.

The question, therefore, isn't simply: Does the system still work?

It is: Can the system support where the organization is going?

Those are two very different questions.

How Far Behind Are You?

There is no single technology that determines whether a building is modern. Instead, look at the capabilities your building possesses—and the choices your architecture gives you.

Consider These Important Questions:

• Can you easily access your building's operational data?
• Can third-party applications use that data?
• Can you integrate systems from multiple manufacturers?
• Can you add new technologies without replacing everything already installed?
• Can you normalize and contextualize data across different buildings and systems?
• Can you connect building data with enterprise and cloud applications?
• Can your architecture support analytics, AI, energy optimization, and emerging applications?
• Can you manage hundreds of buildings as effectively as one?
• Can you choose different controllers, devices, applications, and service providers?
• Can you securely connect OT systems with IT environments?
• Can you modernize incrementally rather than through expensive rip-and-replace projects?
• Can your infrastructure adapt to technologies that haven't been selected – or perhaps invented – yet?

If there are too many answers that are no, you may be further behind than you think.

Connectivity Isn't the Finish Line

For years, the industry talked about connecting buildings. That was necessary. But connected does not automatically mean smart. A building can have thousands of connected devices and still struggle to produce meaningful information.

The next challenge is making all that connected data usable. That requires moving beyond simply collecting points.

Operational data increasingly needs to be:

Connected → Normalized → Contextualized → Governed → Distributed → Analyzed → Actionable

This is where many organizations discover that their real modernization problem isn't necessarily their equipment. It is their data infrastructure. They have data. Lots of it. But it exists in different controllers, systems, databases, gateways, naming conventions, protocols, and proprietary platforms.

The next generation of smarter buildings will increasingly depend upon creating a common operational data foundation capable of supporting many applications.

Are You Behind on IP?

The building automation industry spent decades operating primarily through specialized control networks. Those networks are not disappearing overnight, nor should functioning infrastructure automatically be replaced. But IP has fundamentally changed the architecture of building automation.

IP-based controls can provide greater connectivity, scalability, interoperability, performance, and alignment with enterprise technology infrastructure. The important question isn't whether every device needs to become IP tomorrow. It is whether your architecture provides a path toward an increasingly IP-centric future. Modernization should be evolutionary whenever possible.

Embrace what works. Modernize what limits you.

Are You Behind on Cybersecurity?

There was a time when building automation cybersecurity largely meant keeping the controls network isolated. That world is disappearing.

Building systems increasingly communicate with enterprise networks, remote services, cloud platforms, mobile applications, analytics engines, energy platforms, vendors, and other external systems. That connectivity creates tremendous value. It also creates responsibility.

Cybersecurity must be increasingly designed into building automation architectures rather than added later. You need:

• Secure Communications
• Authentication
• Encryption
• Role-Based Access
• Credential Management
• Network Segmentation
• Software Maintenance
• Patch Management
• Device Lifecycle Management
• Vulnerability Management

Cybersecurity is no longer simply an IT conversation. It is part of operating a building.

Are You Behind on Your Data?

This may be the biggest question of all. For decades, building automation systems were designed primarily around control. Read a sensor. Execute logic. Command equipment. Generate an alarm. Display information. Those capabilities remain essential. But operational data now has value far beyond the control loop.

Building Data Can Support:

• Energy Management
• Fault Detection and Diagnostics
• Predictive Maintenance
• Portfolio Benchmarking
• Sustainability
• Demand Response
• Space Utilization
• Capital Planning
• Digital Twins
• Enterprise Applications
• Machine Learning
• Artificial Intelligence
• And applications we haven't conceived yet

If your operational data is trapped inside individual controllers, proprietary systems, isolated databases, or disconnected buildings, you may possess an enormous digital asset that you cannot effectively use.

The smarter-building discussion is increasingly becoming a data discussion.

Are You Behind on AI?

AI may be the industry's most discussed technology. But asking whether your building "has AI" may be the wrong question.

A better question is: Is your building ready for AI? AI depends upon data. And not simply large quantities of data. It needs accessible, reliable, normalized, contextualized, trustworthy data. Before organizations rush to deploy AI, they should examine the infrastructure underneath it and ask:

• Can the data be accessed? Does it have context?
• Is equipment consistently identified?
• Can information from multiple systems and buildings be combined?
• Is the data trustworthy?
• Can applications securely consume it?

The AI race may ultimately be won not by the organizations that deploy AI first, but by those that create the best operational data foundation for AI to use.

Are You Behind on Openness?

This may be one of the most misunderstood issues in building automation. A system supporting BACnet does not automatically mean the entire architecture is open. Neither does supporting an API.

True openness is about choice and options.

Can you choose another controller? Another integrator? Another service provider? Another analytics platform? Another cloud? Another visualization tool? Another AI application? Can you access your data? Can you take that data somewhere else? Can you change direction without replacing your entire infrastructure? The ultimate test of openness may be remarkably simple: Can you change your mind?

Because buildings can operate for 30, 40, 50 years or longer. The technology decisions made today should not unnecessarily determine every technology decision that follows.

Are You Behind on Portfolio Thinking?

Another major shift is taking place. Historically, building automation was largely approached one building at a time.

One BAS. One workstation. One database. One operating team.

That model becomes increasingly difficult when organizations operate dozens, hundreds, or thousands of locations. Smarter-building strategies increasingly need to think beyond individual buildings.

The question becomes: How do we turn many individually automated buildings into one connected operational environment?

That requires common approaches to connectivity, data models, naming, cybersecurity, governance, applications, analytics, and enterprise integration. One smart building is useful. A connected portfolio can be transformational.

The Real Risk Is Not Being Behind

Technology changes constantly. No building owner can—or should—deploy every new technology. Being behind the latest technology trend isn't necessarily a problem.

The bigger risk is having an architecture that prevents you from catching up when you decide the time is right. That distinction matters. A building does not necessarily need AI today. But its data infrastructure should not prevent AI tomorrow.

A building may not participate in demand response today. But its architecture should not make participation prohibitively difficult tomorrow. You may not need a digital twin today. You may not need enterprise analytics today. You may not need a new cloud application today. But you should have an architecture that gives you the option to pursue them. That is what future readiness really means.

From "Are We Behind?" to "Are We Ready?"

Perhaps the objective isn't to constantly chase technology. It is to create an environment capable of absorbing change. That means building automation and controls architectures that are:

• Open
• Interoperable
• Secure
• IP-Capable
• Data-Centric
• Scalable
• Application-Ready
• AI-Ready
• Enterprise-Ready
• Adaptable

Because the smarter-building journey does not have a finish line. There will always be another technology. Another application. Another cybersecurity requirement. Another energy challenge. Another operational objective. Another use for your data.

The organizations best positioned for the future will not necessarily be those with the newest buildings or the newest controls. They will be the organizations whose infrastructure gives them the ability to adapt, integrate, evolve, and choose.

So perhaps the question you should ask isn't: Are we using the latest building technology?

Ask something much more revealing: Are we far behind?

And then ask the question that matters even more: If the world changes tomorrow, how quickly can we catch up?

Because in building automation, controls, and smarter buildings, being ready for what's next may be far more important than having everything that's new today.

Marc Petock, VP, Chief Marketing & Communications Officer, Lynxspring Marc Petock, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer at Lynxspring since 2012, leads corporate strategy, product vision, and brand development, including JENEsys Edge®, Onyxx®, and E2E™. Previously VP of Global Marketing at Tridium, he helped position Niagara as the industry’s open platform for smart buildings, growing its adoption from 18K to 475K instances. A recognized industry leader, Marc is an advocate for open standards, semantic tagging, data modeling, and OT cybersecurity. He is a frequent speaker, published author, and recipient of multiple industry awards. Marc also advises Realcomm and co-founded Project Haystack, where he serves on the Board.

Read Next

8/5/2026
The Agentic Frontier: Artificial Intelligence in Commercial Real Estate This article reviews the artificial intelligence (AI) literature in commercial real estate through a mechanism-based framework organized around three steps.

8/5/2026
Building performance standards: what commercial operators need to know If you own or operate an office, industrial or mixed-use property in an environmentally conscious city or state, you have likely received notice to benchmark or comply with a Building Performance Standards (BPS) program.

7/29/2026
Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions: 40 Years of Software Innovation Across Manufacturing, Buildings, and Infrastructure Automation and digitalization software is expected to support organizations through years of operational change.

6/24/2026
The Hidden Costs of Running Investment Operations Across Multiple Systems Most real estate investment firms build their technology stack the same way: one problem at a time.